This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/oh/state/ for current information.
LWV LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS

Smart Voter
all of Hamilton County, OH November 7, 2000 Election
Judge; Court of Appeals; District 1; 6 Year Term Starting 2/9/01

Candidates Answer Questions on the Issues

The questions were prepared by the League of Women Voters of the Cincinnati Area and asked of all candidates for this office.

See below for questions on Public financing, Merit selection, Racial Fairness

Click on a name for other candidate information.


1. Do you support public financing of campaigns for judicial candidates? Why or why not?

Answer from Mark P. Painter:

Public financing of judicial campaigns should not be necessary. Judges should be chosen on merit, and should be insulated from the political process. Political campaigns are suitable for choosing representatives-but the interpretation and application of the law is not a political act. A proper system of merit selection must guard against elitism by including not only lawyers, but other citizens on selection boards. We should have the best judges, not the most electable.


2. Would you support merit selection of judges? Why or why not?

Answer from Mark P. Painter:

Judges should be chosen on merit, and should be insulated from the political process. Judges should not campaign for office, because the interpretation and application of the law should not depend on majority whim. The very nature of our legal system is to protect the weak from the strong, the minority from the majority. We should have the best judges, not the most electable.


3. In light of the Report of the Ohio Commission on Racial Fairness: Reviewing fairness of the Ohio legal system, what do you see as your role in addressing racism within the legal system

Answer from Mark P. Painter:

We have come a long way in the last few years, but not far enough. During my last year in Municipal Court (1995), sometimes the prosecutor, defense lawyer, and police officer would all be minorities. That would not have happened a few short years before. Because diversity is important, and because there are eminently qualified people available, the next judge on our court of appeals should be a minority. We currently are six white males.


Responses to questions asked of each candidate are reproduced as submitted to the League, but formatted for Web display. Candidates' statements are presented as submitted. Word limits for answers are 75 words for each question. Direct references to opponents are not permitted

The order of the candidates is random and changes daily.


This Contest || Home (Ballot Lookup) || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: January 25, 2001 02:41
Smart Voter 2000 <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © 2000 League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.