League of Women Voters of California
| ||||
|
||||
Measure O Transit Occupancy Tax City of Burlingame Tax Ordinance - Majority Vote Required 3,780 / 71.6% Yes votes ...... 1,501 / 28.4% No votes
See Also:
Index of all Measures |
||||
|
Information shown below: Yes/No Meaning | Impartial Analysis | Arguments | Full Text | |||||
"Shall the ordinance amending the Burlingame Municipal Code to sustain and continue an increase in the transient occupancy tax rate from eight percent (8%) to ten percent (10%) on the rent charged hotel guests within the City of Burlingame be adopted?"
The City estimates that the tax increment between 8% and 10% generates approximately $2.8 million per year, which goes into the City's general fund for general government purposes, including capital improvements, in the City. The tax is collected by hotels as part of room bills. Because under the proposed measure, the tax revenue would be put into the City's general fund for general City government purposes, a majority vote of the City's voters voting in this election is required to approve the measure. Because the tax would be adopted by a vote of the people, the tax rate could not be increased except by another vote of the people.
|
General Links
|
Arguments For Measure O | Arguments Against Measure O |
Continue an increase in the general business tax rate from $50 per year to $100 per year.
Measure O will not increase the 10% hotel tax, which is currently being assessed, but will simply provide voter confirmation to continue the hotel tax at the same level that it has been since 1991. In 1991 when the Council set the rate it was felt that voter confirmation was not required, however recent court rulings have led the City Council to believe it would be prudent to place the item before the voters for confirmation. Vote Yes on Measure O and keep tax revenues fairly distributed to all those who use our city services. Approval of Measure O will insure that the thousands of hotel visitors who travel our streets; frequent our restaurants and retail areas; enjoy our beautiful shoreline trails and open space; as well as rely daily on our police, fire and medical response services pay their fair share. Approval of Measure O will prevent a loss of $2.8 million of hotel tax per year. Failure to approve Measure O would effectively increase Burlingame's dependency on revenues collected from the property tax payers to fund essential city services. Measure O will keep the hotel tax effectively at the same level as 12 other San Mateo County cities and below the 14% rate currently charged in San Francisco. The increase in the hotel tax from 8% to 10% has made it possible to rebuild our Library, construct the Bayfront bike path, as well as build the Burlingame Bayside soccer and golf centers. As we approach our 100th year anniversary as a City, it is important that we ensure our revenue structure continues to allow for necessary investment in our aging infrastructure. Join with the Peninsula Hoteliers, the Chamber of Commerce, Burlingame merchants and all the City Council candidates and current members in supporting Measure O.
/s/ Joe Galligan
/s/ Mary Janney
/s/ Stan Moore
/s/ Georgette Naylor
/s/ Ron Agron
| NO ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE O SUBMITTED
|
Full Text of Measure O |
This ordinance is proposed by the City Council of the City of Burlingame and continues an increase in the transient occupancy tax rate from eight percent (8%) to ten percent (10%).
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF BURLINGAME DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Section 4.09.025 is added as follows: 4.09.025 Tax Rate For the privilege of occupancy in any hotel, each transient is subject to and shall pay a tax in the amount of ten percent (10%) of the rent charged by the operator. Section 2. This ordinance shall be considered adopted on the date that the City Council declares the vote, and shall go into effect ten (10) days thereafter. |