This is an archive of a past election. See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/mrn/ for current information. |
Marin County, CA | November 5, 2002 Election |
Patient ServicesBy Suzanna CoxheadCandidate for Director; Marin Healthcare District | |
This information is provided by the candidate |
•. Trauma Center. Marin General is the County's Level III Trauma Center, with the additional standard of 24/7 neurological coverage. I actively supported Marin General's trauma designation by the County, which became effective January 1, 2001. Trauma patients continue to be flown out of Marin for care primarily for two reasons. First, Marin General does not have a helipad and consequently medical emergencies (not just trauma cases)in West Marin or when traffic is congested on 101, are flown out of County for care because of time considerations. Second, some trauma cases are so severe that patients are best cared for at higher level trauma centers which are located in Santa Rosa, SF, Walnut Creek and at Children's in Oakland for pediatric cases. While Marin County did not meet the American College of Surgeons guidelines for the number of trauma cases for a Level II trauma center when the County's trauma plan was approved in 2000, these guidelines may now be changing. However, the designation of a Level II would require the addition of a helipad as part of the County's trauma plan and there has been opposition to a helipad at Marin General in past years. Also, I agree with a spokesperson with the American College of Surgeons who said that consideration must be given to the economic feasibility of maintaining a higher Level II trauma center in this County with its relatively low population base. Marin General must remain financially healthy in order to maintain quality patient services. • Mental Health. The County is responsible for Marin's mental health services not Marin General Hospital. Marin General maintains a 15 bed behavioral health inpatient unit for private and for County patients, including medi-cal patients. However, County patients regularly go out of county for care for several reasons, one, because there are no open beds; two, because the County can get care at lower cost else where and three, because the patient presents a specific problem which can be better cared for in a different type of environment than the Marin General unit provides. The mental health wing of the Hospital also includes a second unit which is operated by the County for patients on 23 hour holds, but which has also been used by the County for office space. The Hospital and the County have been in discussion for months to move the office personnel and to make some of that space available for additional long term inpatient mental health beds. The Grand Jury completed a report on mental health services in the Summer which was critical of both the County and the Hospital for not working together more constructively to develop a plan to expand the number of acute care psychiatric inpatient beds at the Hospital. I support the County and the Hospital developing a more cooperative working relationship and if re-elected, I will encourage the District to put pressure on both entities to follow through.
•Staffing: Because of the higher acuity levels of patients
and because of the State's new nurse/patient ratios, Marin
General has focused on hiring more nurses, which I support,
and now has more nurses than at any time since at least • Quality of Care: Marin General is a good hospital with excellent doctors and nurses. Last year, Marin General received a 96 rating by JCAHO, (Joint Commission on the Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations), one of the highest scores in the country and the highest rating of all Sutter Health hospitals surveyed last year. JCAHO is the most well known accreditation organization nationwide and surveys each hospital every three years. In addition, there are patient satisfaction surveys of hospital patients and quality of care surveys of medical outcomes. Many of these indices are still in their formative stages of development and positive or negative results can be misused. I do believe that it is the role of the District Board to monitor quality of care indicators and patient satisfaction surveys and to raise accountability questions if ratings are consistently lower than for comparable hospitals. |
Candidate Page
|| Feedback to Candidate
|| This Contest
November 2002 Home (Ballot Lookup)
|| About Smart Voter