This is an archive of a past election. See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/state/ for current information. |
Alameda, Santa Clara County, CA | March 2, 2004 Election |
Propositions 57 & 58: Borrowing Against the FutureBy Ash BhattCandidate for Member of the State Assembly; District 20; Democratic Party | |
This information is provided by the candidate |
Gov. Schwarzenegger's so-called Balanced Budget Act is not a solution to the current budget crisis -- it will put the state even deeper in debt.Proposition 57 is supposed to solve our financial troubles. But for how long and at what cost? The $15 billion bond will cost each California family over $2000 and won't invest a single dollar in our schools, our roads, healthcare, or jobs for working people. Rather than add to the billions of dollars of state's debt, we need to develop creative solutions during these difficult times in order to increase revenues without burdening our families any further. A single example: Instead of tax increases or more borrowing, my proposal for a one-dollar increase in the price of California's lottery tickets alone would bring the state $3 billion. California has a proud tradition: We borrow money long term in order to invest in projects that also benefit us long term. Since 1849, the California Constitution has prohibited bond measures like Proposition 57 that allow long-term borrowing just to balance the budget in the short term. This tradition has allowed the state to be visionary rather than short sighted. Fifty years ago, we built the nation's first highway system and, over the past century, we developed the finest public university system in the world. On March 2, Proposition 55 continues this tradition, borrowing money to invest further in our schools where they need it the most. As a member of the State Assembly, I will work to get another bond measure on the ballot, investing in high-speed rail service that will bring Bay Area residents to Los Angeles in less than three hours. This is in keeping with our vision and our tradition. By contrast, Proposition 57 endangers that. Bundled together with Proposition 57, Proposition 58 is being called the "Balanced Budget Act." But this is a cynical attempt to paint over the facts. Borrowing $15 billion just puts off the day of reckoning. More importantly, it will cost us billions of dollars more in interest payments to service this debt. Proposition 58 also claims to put aside $5 billion to protect us against future deficits. But half of that protection will itself be borrowed! We need a different kind of leadership in Sacramento. While three of my opponents support these measures, we must not throw up our hands and abandon our traditions. Working people in the state deserve the best schools, affordable housing, and good healthcare. But we must not panic in times of financial crisis. We need to look carefully at our priorities, moving away from excessive spending on prisons and toward promoting new jobs and industries that will expand the tax base. District 20 is at the crossroads of these opportunities and challenges. We must not let ourselves get sidetracked by so-called "Economic Recovery" and "Balanced Budget Acts" that do nothing but limit what will be possible tomorrow. |
Next Page:
Position Paper 2
Candidate Page
|| Feedback to Candidate
|| This Contest
March 2004 Home (Ballot Lookup)
|| About Smart Voter
ca/state
Created from information supplied by the candidate: February 29, 2004 13:17
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright ©
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor
opposes candidates for public office or political parties.