This is an archive of a past election. See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/la/ for current information. |
League of Women Voters of California Education Fund
| ||||
|
||||
Measure Malibu-D Communications Tax City of Malibu 1,565 / 63.6% Yes votes ...... 895 / 36.4% No votes
See Also:
Index of all Measures |
||||
|
Information shown below: Impartial Analysis | | ||||
Shall an Ordinance be adopted that 1) reduces the tax rate from 5% to 4.5%, 2) adds modern communication technologies to the activities taxed, 3) preserves the local telephone tax against changes in federal law, and 4) retains the existing exemptions for seniors?
The utility user tax on telephone services was adopted by the City of Malibu in 1991 shortly after incorporation as a continuation of a County tax already in place. The tax has been imposed on telephone customers in the City and collected on their telephone bills at a rate of 5% for the past seventeen years. The revenues from the telephone tax -- approximately $1,036,000 in 2006-2007 (approximately 4% of the general fund revenue) -- are used exclusively within the City for general governmental purposes. The existing tax ordinance is outdated due to dramatic changes in the telephone industry and signifi cant advances in technology since that time, and the tax is not imposed on communication services and devices that have since come into existence. The proposed ordinance would reduce the tax rate from 5% to 4 ½ %. It would also retain the existing exemption for seniors. The proposed ordinance would update the existing ordinance to apply the telephone tax to all types of communication services, unless precluded by federal statute. Currently, a federal statute precludes local taxation of internet services, email, and broadband services providing access to the internet. Further, the proposed ordinance would not apply to digital downloads such as music, games and ringtones. The tax cannot be increased in the future without a vote of the people. The proposed ordinance has no effect on the existing utility user tax applied to electrical, gas and water services. Recent federal court decisions in other states have cast doubt on whether the ordinance, as currently written, can be imposed on long distance, cellular and bundled telephone services. Several California cities with ordinances similar to Malibu’s are currently embroiled in litigation on this issue. Should California courts determine such ordinances inapplicable to those telephone services, the revenues collected from the current ordinance would be reduced substantially. Adoption of the proposed ordinance would protect the City from an adverse outcome in any such litigation. A “yes” vote is in favor of adopting the updated communications tax ordinance summarized above. A “no” vote is against adopting the ordinance. A majority of “yes” votes is required for the ordinance to be enacted.
|
Official Information Local Facts
|