This is an archive of a past election. See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/sba/ for current information. |
| ||||||
|
||||||
Measure H2008 Parcel Tax to Offset Budget Cuts Santa Barbara High School District 2/3 Approval Required Pass: 59747 / 71.25% Yes votes ...... 24104 / 28.75% No votes
See Also:
Index of all Measures |
||||||
|
Results as of Dec 2 1:22pm, 99.9% of Precincts Reporting (318/137) |
Information shown below: Official Information | Impartial Analysis | Arguments | | |||||
To offset severe state budget cuts to our schools; protect the quality of education; enhance math, science and technology education; supplement music, arts, foreign language and theater programs at the secondary level; and restore math class size reduction; shall Santa Barbara High School District be authorized to implement a $23 annual parcel tax for four years, with an available exemption for senior citizens, with independent citizen oversight, without administrative salaries, and with every dollar staying in our local schools?
MEASURE H2008 California Constitution, Article XIIIA, section 4 and the California Government Code (§ 50075 et seq.) authorize a school district, upon approval of the voters within the district by a two-thirds vote (2/3), to impose a special tax on real property parcels within the district. This measure, if approved by two-thirds (2/3) of the voters within the Santa Barbara High School District (the "District") will authorize the District to levy a parcel tax of $23 per year against each parcel of land that lies wholly or partially within District boundaries that has been assigned an assessor's parcel number. (The full text of the measure is printed in the ballot pamphlet.) The parcel tax is to be levied for four (4) fiscal years, without increase, beginning in the fiscal year starting July 1, 2009 and ending in the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2012. The parcel tax shall be collected in the same manner and will be subject to the same interest and penalties as general property taxes and the proceeds will be deposited into a separate restricted account and shall be used only for the following specific purposes:
The oversight committee shall advise the Board on expenditures funded by the measure to ensure funds are only spent for the purposes stated in the measure by the District. Charter schools authorized by the District shall share in the tax funding, proportional to the enrollment of students from the District and will report annually to the Board and community on how tax funds have been spent. Any owner, that is 65 years of age or older, of a parcel used solely for owner-occupied, single-family residential purposes may receive an exemption from the parcel tax by annually submitting an application by June 15 of each year to the Board in accordance with the Board's adopted rules and regulations. A YES vote means the measure and parcel tax are APPROVED. A NO vote means the measure and parcel tax are NOT APPROVED. Dennis A. Marshall County Counsel >
|
|
Arguments For Measure H2008 | Arguments Against Measure H2008 | ||
The Santa Barbara High School District has provided a high-quality educational program for 142 years. Due to substantial state budget cuts, local schools need supplemental local tax dollars to fund programs that provide our students with the highest quality education. Measure H2008 will provide a ` stable, consistent, locally controlled funding source.
The $23 per.year investment equals about 6 cents per day toward the education of over 10,000 students in the. Santa Barbara High School District. Measure H2008 will allow the. Santa Barbara High School District to:
Please join us in investing in the future of our children. Larry Crandell, Community Volunteer Michael Bennett, Mayor, CIty of Goleta Jean Blois, Councilmember, City of Goleta Lanny Ebenstein, Former Trustee, SB High School District Claire VanBlaricum, Former Trustee, SB High School District
If education is their priority then why has the district done the following? Created a position of Deputy Superintendent, salary $186,000 per year, instead of funding your child's music program? Built pools that can only be heated, filtered, and lit by cutting your school's science or art program? Promoted increased nighttime stadium lit activities, vastly increasing energy costs, rather than funding technology programs? Bloated administrative salaries while cutting language programs? Why Vote NO? The Santa Barbara School District has not managed your tax dollars well. Measure H is so vague that any use of the money could be justified. The funds are spread across so many programs as to be ineffective. Parcel taxation is as unreliable as a funding source as the state process. The senior exemption could reduce the revenue by 20%. Why are academic programs always cut first? It is time to demand that education be our highest priority! Bring change by Voting No on H2008! If the district wants tax money, let them specify the programs, amounts and sites where the monies will be spent. You are free to donate to your favorite teacher or program, but Vote No on Measure H! Carmen L. Rouse Alwyn N. Hartnett Richard A. Foster Dolores L. Hartnett Harry S. Rouse | Taxpayers should vote NO on H. The Santa Barbara School District has a horrible record of delivering what they promise to do. Secondly, they have had years of chaotic, revolving door leadership. Thirdly, if this passes they will be back in four years demanding even more money while threatening to terminate your favorite programs.
How many annual budget fiascos have we seen? Yet administrative salaries have skyrocketed. In 2000, the Superintendent's salary was $126,796. This year.it is $200,566, an increase of $73,770. Yet, they lay off teachers! Bond Measure V's stated purpose was "To repair and upgrade every school in the Santa Barbara High School District and achieve facility parity, replace old portables." Yet, $100,000-000 later Santa Barbara High hasn't had a functioning cafeteria for two years! Instead of parity, they built three different sized pools, which we not even mentioned on the ballot, and they never replaced a single portable!" Bond oversight doesn't help. At the 4/4/2006 Measure V Bond oversight meeting, a member complained of a $2.2 million dollar difference between school board and bond committee reports. He stated, "These (financial) statements will make great anti-bond campaign material!" Indeed, how can we expect them to do any better with a parcel tax? How will it be spent? At the 6/24/09 Board meeting Dn Sarvis said the elected board would not determine how the money was spent. A board member suggested that a parcel tax would free up monies for the general fund. The only way it could do that would be to strip existing funding from one program and replace it with parcel tax money. Schools need money, but the public should be able to trust the district. They must earn our trust by proving themselves reliable, and competent before asking for our tax dollars. Carmen L. Rouse Alwyn N. Hartnett Richard A. Foster Dolores L. Hartnett Harry S. Rouse
Measure H2008 would result in:
At a time when gangs are of concern and when young people need more to do, there are few more effective and worthwhile expenditures than $23 per year to allow substantial improvements and additions to our junior and senior high educational program. No parcel would be taxed more than $23. There would be an exemption for senior citizens who requested it. Santa Barbara, Goleta, and Montecito have traditionally had excellent public junior highs and high schools. Measure H2008 will enable this tradition of excellence to continue. Please join with us in voting for Measure H2008. Support Measure H2008 and invest in our future while restoring local control of our tax dollars. YES ON H2008! Lois Capps, Member of Congress Salud Carbajal, First District Supervisor, SB County Dale Francisco, City of Santa Barbara Council Member Dale Bugay, REgent Emeritus, University of California Peter MacDonald, Past President, Santa Barbara City College |