This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/sac/ for current information.
LWV League of Women Voters of California Education Fund If you appreciate our service to voters, please consider helping us with a donation.
Smart Voter
Sacramento County, CA November 2, 2010 Election
Measure N
Increase to a Seven Member Legislative Body
City of Elk Grove

Advisory Vote Only

Fail: 16,833 / 42.55% Yes votes ...... 22,727 / 57.45% No votes

See Also: Index of all Measures

Results as of Jan 3 10:57am, 100.0% of Precincts Reporting (105/105)
Information shown below: Official Information | Impartial Analysis | Arguments |

Shall members of the legislative body of the City of Elk Grove be qualified by and elected from six(6) districts and the Mayor be qualified and elected on a citywide basis by the voters of the entire city; a Yes vote increases the legislative body to seven (7) members; a No vote retains the current size of the legislative body at five (5)members.

Official Sources of Information

Impartial Analysis from Elk Grove City Attorney
LEGAL IMPACT

Background. This measure is an Advisory Vote only, asking for general voter opinion on a proposal to add two Council residency districts in the City of Elk Grove, which will increase the size of the City Council of the City of Elk Grove ("Council") from five to seven members.

Since incorporation, the City of Elk Grove has been governed by a five-member Council. Commencing with the 2002 election, Council members have been elected "from district". This means that a candidate for Council must live within a certain geographic area of the City, but is subject to vote by all registered voters of the City.

On the ballot with Measure K is a measure that, if passed, would create the office of an elective Mayor. If the office of elected Mayor is created, the City would generally designate one of the existing Council seats for the elected Mayor, resulting in a Council made up of four Council Members and the elected Mayor. Because the City of Elk Grove will be adjusting or creating new districts in 2011, and because of the potential to have the newly created position of elected Mayor, the Council has placed this advisory question to determine whether the residents of Elk Grove wish to maintain a Council of five members (four Council Members and the elected Mayor) or to expand the Council to a total of seven members (six Council Members and the Elected Mayor).

Effect. Measure N is an advisory measure only. If the office of elected Mayor is established, the number of districts must change. The Council is seeking community input on the future size of the Council as districts for the 2012 election are being evaluated. The measure is advisory only because the City does not yet know what the boundaries of the district and an elected mayor configuration would be; any changes to the current five residency district configuration is subject to vote by all registered voters of the City.

Following completion of the redistricting for the 2012 election, the Council may bring back one or more proposals to the voters regarding the actual district boundaries.

A "YES" vote is a vote to advise the Council to consider the creation of six council districts for a seven-member Council.

A "NO" vote is a vote not to advise the Council to consider the creation of six council districts for a total of seven members on the Council if the office of elected Mayor is created, but to retain a Council of five members (four Council Members and the Mayor).

FISCAL IMPACT

To establish new districts to accommodate the office of elected Mayor in time for the November 2012 election, the City would need to consolidate with a special election, incurring an estimated one-time cost of $60,000. The addition of two Council seats has an expected annual cost of $80,000 to provide compensation and operational expenses for the new Council members, and would add an additional election contest cost of $9,000 every two year cycle.

Respectfully submitted,
Susan Burns Cochran, City Attorney

 
This election is archived. Any links to sources outside of Smart Voter may no longer be active. No further links will be added to this page.
Links to sources outside of Smart Voter are provided for information only and do not imply endorsement.

Arguments For Measure N Arguments Against Measure N
NO ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF OR AGAINST MEASURE N WAS FILED

NO ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF OR AGAINST MEASURE N WAS FILED


Sacramento Home Page || Statewide Links || About Smart Voter || Feedback
Created: January 6, 2011 14:59 PST
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund   http://cavotes.org
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.