This is an archive of a past election.
See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/sd/ for current information.
San Diego County, CA November 2, 2010 Election
Smart Voter

Agricultural Water and Ramona Water District Policies

By Kit Kesinger

Candidate for Director; Ramona Municipal Water District; Division 2

This information is provided by the candidate
The Ramona Water District can help the Agricultural Community by providing lower cost water
Water policy over the last several years has been hard on the Ag Industry in Ramona. The Metropolitan Water District (MWD, based in L.A.) has eliminated subsidies on Ag water, and during the last several years of drought they've imposed mandatory cutbacks on available water for agriculture. The Ramona Water Board pretty much passed through all the price increases and cutbacks. The bottom line is that orchards and farms using Ramona Water District (RMWD) Ag water have become less profitable, some stopped maintaining their trees, and some have been pushed out of business all together. I'm not a grower myself, but I agree with most Ramonans that it would be a travesty to lose a significant part of our agriculture industry.

What the Water District can do for the Ag Industry in Ramona is provide lower-cost local water - a combination of Sutherland Reservoir water and ground water. Today, 100% of the water delivered in RMWD's raw water system comes from San Diego County Water Authority (CWA). It's the highest priced source of water available, costing Ramona millions of dollars more per year than local water would.

GROUND WATER: The main advantage of ground water is, it's the least expensive water that could be used in the existing Ag Water System. The main disadvantage is that ground water from the west side of the Santa Maria Aquifer has high salt levels (measured as Total Dissolved Solids, or TDS), which wouldn't benefit Ramona's avocado growers.

SUTHERLAND RESERVOIR WATER: The main advantage of Sutherland water is that it has very low TDS, and could be used to dilute ground water TDS for use in the Ag Water System. The main disadvantage is that a pipeline is needed to bring Sutherland water from Wellfield Park to connect with the Ag Water System in west Ramona. The combined cost savings from slightly less expensive Sutherland water and very inexpensive ground water would pay for the pipeline and other improvements to bring Sutherland Reservoir water to the Ag System.

There are 3 major advantages to this plan:
1. Once the pipeline improvements have been paid off (20 years or less), the cost of Ag water would drop significantly. There might be a slight cost savings immediately, depending on the actual costs and how financing is structured.
2. During average rainfall and wet years, enough water can be brought from Sutherland Reservoir to reduce TDS in the Ag Water System to below CWA levels. The lower TDS would include water stored in Lake Ramona, which would then reduce TDS in the following dry years.
3. The Ag Water System would become more reliable, with alternatives to CWA water during mandatory cutbacks or other interruptions of water from the Colorado River.

A feasibility study has already been done for this project. During my first term on the Water Board, I worked with Doug Wilsman and District Engineer Tim Stanton to create a preliminary design, and financial estimate of the capital costs and payback period. At that time we determined the project had too long of a payback period. However, in the current economy it should easily be cost effective, due to lower interest rates, lower construction costs and higher water prices.

The current Water Board is not working for lower priced Ag water. However, it's been one of my top priorities since my first term on the Ramona Water Board.

Candidate Page || Feedback to Candidate || This Contest
November 2010 Home (Ballot Lookup) || About Smart Voter


ca/sd Created from information supplied by the candidate: October 3, 2010 15:40
Smart Voter <http://www.smartvoter.org/>
Copyright © League of Women Voters of California Education Fund.
The League of Women Voters neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office or political parties.