This is an archive of a past election. See http://www.smartvoter.org/ca/stn/ for current information. |
| ||||||
|
||||||
Measure R Advisory Vote City of Modesto Advisory Vote Only Pass: 17,482 / 75.10% Yes votes ...... 5,797 / 24.90% No votes
See Also:
Index of all Measures |
||||||
|
Results as of Nov 18 1:55pm, 100.0% of Precincts Reporting (152/152) |
Information shown below: Impartial Analysis | Arguments | | ||||
Shall the City Council of the City of Modesto move the City employees retirement benefit calculation from a single highest year salary baseline to an average of the employee's last three years of salary as a baseline?
Currently, the City's contract with the California Public Employees Retirement System allows for an employee's retirement benefit to be calculated upon the use of the employee's single highest year of salary as the baseline for the retirement allowance the employee will receive. This is in contrast to a retirement benefit that would require that an employee's retirement benefit be calculated upon the use of an average of the employee's salary over their last three years of employment. Use of a three-year average salary as a baseline may result in a reduced retirement benefit. This advisory measure asks the voters to voice their opinion with respect to whether the City Council should seek to move a City employee's retirement benefit calculation from a formula that uses a single highest year, to an average of the employee's last three years salary. The outcome of the election will be presented to the City Council as information concerning the opinions of the voters on this measure. However, the outcome of the election with respect to this measure will not bind the Council to act in any particular way with respect to this aspect of the City's retirement program. You should vote "YES" on this measure if you want to advise the City Council that you are in favor of the Council seeking to move the current City retirement benefit calculation baseline from a single highest year salary to an average of the employee's last three years of salary. You should vote "NO" on this measure if you want to advise the City Council that you are not in favor of the Council seeking to move the current City retirement benefit calculation baseline from a single highest year salary to an average of the employee's last three years of salary. The measure seeks a non-binding advisory opinion only. According to California Elections Code Section 9603(c), advisory votes express general voter opinion but do not bind the City or the City Council to act in any manner.
/s/ Susana Alcala Wood
The above statement is an impartial analysis of Measure R. If you desire a copy of the measure, please call the City Clerk's Office at (209) 577-5396 and a copy will be mailed at no cost to you.
|
News and Analysis Modesto Bee
|
Arguments For Measure R | Arguments Against Measure R | ||
Should the City of Modesto:
The City of Modesto has already moved to prevent future employees from engaging in pension spiking, however, nothing prevents current public employees from doing that. This advisory measure will encourage future councils to take measures to end pension spiking. This would most likely take the form of requiring the city to determine pension benefit levels by averaging the employee's last three years, instead of basing that number on just the single top- earning year. If we do not make this change, then the City of Modesto will have to turn to increased taxes or reduce services to fund the costs of public pensions. Please join with business groups, taxpayer advocates, and residents of Modesto from all avenues of life in supporting this measure to ensure the fair determination of all public pension benefits for current employees by keeping their benefit determination in line with that of future public employees.
/s/ Brad Hawn, Vice Mayor City of Modesto
/s/ Adam Christianson
| Measure R is more political grandstanding by the city council! The city and Modesto's employees have already agreed to move to the three year average calculation for pension purposes. Do they want to change now? M
Measure R is not needed, is poorly worded, and is nothing more than political grandstanding. Pension reform is a serious issue. Measure R is not a serious measure. Both the city of Modesto and its employee associations agree to the three year average concept for new employees. Let's not fix something that isn't broken. No one supports pension spiking. Do not let the politicians undermine significant reform with phoney advisory elections designed to mislead and confuse. Measure R is a costly ballot measure that will change nothing, will accomplish nothing. It only serves to provide conveinent cover for politicians who want to claim to have done something positive during their long years in office. Don't reward do nothing politicians! Vote No on Measure R!
/s/ Laurie A. Smith, President, Modesto Confidential Management Association
Public employee unions want to continue the practice of pension spiking which allows public employees to artificially boost their final year pay and increase their retirement. The City of Modesto already moved to prevent future employees from engaging in pension spiking, but current employees are able to continue spiking their pensions. Measure R is simply an advisory measure to encourage future city councils to stop pension spiking. Vote YES on Measure R. Join with business groups, taxpayer advocates and residents of Modesto from all avenues of life in supporting a fiscally responsible Modesto.
/s/ Donna Worley, Resident
|